2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.15.490691
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Access Repository-Scale Propagated Nearest Neighbor Suspect Spectral Library for Untargeted Metabolomics

Abstract: Despite the increasing availability of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) community spectral libraries for untargeted metabolomics over the past decade, the majority of acquired MS/MS spectra remain uninterpreted. To further aid in interpreting unannotated spectra, we created a nearest neighbor suspect spectral library, consisting of 87,916 annotated MS/MS spectra derived from hundreds of millions of public MS/MS spectra. Annotations were propagated based on structural relationships to reference molecules using … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, neutral loss matching first transforms MS/MS spectra into neutral loss spectra by mirroring the fragment ion m/z values at precursor m/z = 810.487). 22 We evaluate the cosine similarity (left), modified cosine similarity (middle), and neutral loss matching (right, visualized as neutral loss spectra) to compare MS/MS spectra to each other. Directly matching fragments with near-identical m/z or ∆m/z values in the original MS/MS spectra and the neutral loss spectra, respectively, are indicated in blue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, neutral loss matching first transforms MS/MS spectra into neutral loss spectra by mirroring the fragment ion m/z values at precursor m/z = 810.487). 22 We evaluate the cosine similarity (left), modified cosine similarity (middle), and neutral loss matching (right, visualized as neutral loss spectra) to compare MS/MS spectra to each other. Directly matching fragments with near-identical m/z or ∆m/z values in the original MS/MS spectra and the neutral loss spectra, respectively, are indicated in blue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( b ) Illustration of the MS/MS spectrum alignment methods applied to the natural product apratoxin A (top; precursor m/z = 840.497) and a newly discovered apratoxin analog (bottom; precursor m/z = 810.487). 22 We evaluate the cosine similarity (left), modified cosine similarity (middle), and neutral loss matching (right, visualized as neutral loss spectra) to compare MS/MS spectra to each other. Directly matching fragments with near-identical m/z or Δ m/z values in the original MS/MS spectra and the neutral loss spectra, respectively, are indicated in blue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that one of the top metabolites associated with both the ketogenic diet and cognitive normality was related to curcumol through a nearest-neighbor suspect library (41). Another compound produced by the same plant, curcumin, was instead elevated in participants with MCI who ate the low-fat AHAD diet ( Figure 4F ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach also relies on annotated mass spectral libraries, but aims at finding molecules that are chemically similar, without the need for them to be identical. Current tools able to perform analogue searches often rely on a (modified) cosine score to predict chemical similarity 4,9,21 . However, a limitation of the cosine score (and its derivatives) is that small chemical modifications can, and multiple chemical modifications will, often result in a large decrease in mass spectral similarity which limits its ability to serve as a proxy for chemical similarity [22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%