Open chemasimTM: Breaking paradigms in process simulation

Hasse, Hans; Bessling, Bernd; Böttcher, Roger

doi:10.1016/s1570-7946(06)80055-6

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this regard, many different numerical methods have been proposed, most of them being based on stage-by-stage algorithms [26,41]. More recently, a few methods have been developed that use simultaneous and homotopy continuations approaches [26,42,43].…”

Section: Theoretical Stagementioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of Distillation Processes

Kenig

Blagov

2014

Distillation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Theoretical Stagementioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of Distillation Processes

Kenig

Blagov

2014

Distillation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CAPE‐OPEN: Interoperability in Industrial Flowsheet Simulation Software

Baten

Pons²

2014

Chemie Ingenieur Technik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chemical process modelling and simulation are widely used in process industries to progress in the understanding and in the improvement of many processes. Due to the complexity and variety of these processes, several pieces of software are often needed to model a given process, hence requiring interoperability between software. CAPE‐OPEN is an industry standard for interoperability between process simulation software. Compared to proprietary interfaces of software applications, CAPE‐OPEN allows for less overhead on programming and maintenance, fast access to market and a common basis for collaboration in joint projects.

show abstract

Modeling and Simulation Environments for Sustainable Low-Carbon Energy Production – A Review

Tumilar

Sharma

Milani

et al. 2016

Chemical Product and Process Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews research trends in modeling for low-carbon energy production. The focus is on two currently significant low-carbon energy processes; namely, bioenergy and post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) processes. The fundamentals of these two processes are discussed and the role of modeling and simulation tools (MSTs) is highlighted. The most popular modeling software packages are identified and their use in the literature is analyzed. Among commercially available packages, it is found that no single software package can handle all process development needs such as, configuration studies, techno-economic analysis, exergy optimization, and process integration. This review also suggests that optimal modeling results reported in literature can be viewed as optimal at the individual plant level, but sub-optimal for plant superstructure level. This review has identified key gaps pertinent to developing hybrid models that describe integrated energy production processes. ASPEN Plus is found to be dominant for modeling both bioenergy and PCC processes for both steady-state and dynamic modes respectively.

show abstract

Open chemasimTM: Breaking paradigms in process simulation

Cited by 3 publications

References 5 publications

Modeling of Distillation Processes

Modeling of Distillation Processes

CAPE‐OPEN: Interoperability in Industrial Flowsheet Simulation Software

Modeling and Simulation Environments for Sustainable Low-Carbon Energy Production – A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About