2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open Domain Question Answering System Based on Knowledge Base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental results show that our proposed method [17] achieves the third place among the 21 systems on NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 KBQA challenge task [39]. The method proposed in [14] achieves the first place and the method proposed in [16] achieves the second place. The improved method proposed in this paper achieves a much better result than most of the state-of-the-art methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental results show that our proposed method [17] achieves the third place among the 21 systems on NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 KBQA challenge task [39]. The method proposed in [14] achieves the first place and the method proposed in [16] achieves the second place. The improved method proposed in this paper achieves a much better result than most of the state-of-the-art methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, most of the information retrieval based methods use all possible n-grams of words of the question to retrieve the candidates from the knowledge base which can introduce lots of noise candidate triples. The system proposed by Lai et al [14] used a SPE (subject predicate extraction) algorithm to extract subject-predicate pair from the question and translate it to a KB query to search the candidates and use a method based on word vector similarity and predicate attention to score the candidate predicates. The method proposed by Wang et al [15] used a classifier to judge whether the predicate in the triple is what the question asked for.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found that our system outperforms all other methods. Compared with systems using pipeline model method and other sophisticated features and hand-craft rules (such as the use of part-of-speech features in the mention detection stage) [14], our framework can still improve the performance on KBQA task, and the straight-forward method is competitive with the state-of-thearts one. [43] 81.06 Kai Lei et al [17] 80.97 Lei Su et al [27] 79.41 Lai et al [14] 82.47 CTEEM+Combined-DSSM+LMS [34] 82.43 BB-KBQA [19] 84.12 MFSMM [42] 80.35 SiamsesATT [28] 81.81 CGRM 85.04…”
Section: Kbqamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They combine an attention mechanism with Bi-LSTM to predict the attributes and obtain the final answer. Lai et al [24] adopt word vector similarity and fine-grained word segmentation to map properties. Meanwhile, they use many artificially constructed rules and features to select the correct answers.…”
Section: Related Work a Knowledge Base Question Answeringmentioning
confidence: 99%