Open innovation, economy of contribution and the territorial dynamics of creative industries

The Impact of Government Policy on Macro Dynamic Innovation of the Creative Industries: Studies of the UK’s and China’s Animation Sectors

“…Open innovation activities are observed as territorial dynamics of cultural and creative industries [15]. On one hand, creative industries are based on knowledge resources, and innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems [15].…”

Work and Social-Ecological Transitions: A Critical Review of Five Contrasting Approaches

“…A recent inspiration emanates from the development of the digital economy, particularly open source software, peer-to-peer platforms and the sharing economy [96,97]. Although technical infrastructures of online collaborative platforms are increasingly captured by strict financial interest, they have the potential for direct interactions between contributors and facilitate the production of societal values on the margin of market relations [98].…”

“…An additional conceptualisation starting from Stiegler's core definition and from his successors helps identifying a number of related principles of contributive economy: (4) Economic operators are driven by not only the challenge of competition but also a willingness to collaborate and generate social interactions and cohesion; (5) Intrinsic motivations are central drivers of contributive economic activities and several types of non-monetary rewards, including social recognition, self-esteem and knowledge acquisition, motivate economic processes; (6) Work is conceptualised as an opportunity to improve people's capabilities and autonomy following Amartya Sen's approach, rather than be reduced to a simple factor of production and consumption [104]; (7) The contributive economy is not exclusive or antagonistic to the capitalist economy; rather, it can be considered a parallel or a niche economy. (8) Contributive economy requires a redefinition of the territorial anchoring of contributors and their activities (including cybernetic spaces) as it is facilitated by web interfaces as well as attempts to re-localise production/consumption networks and direct interactions between contributors [98]. (9) The finality of contributive economy, in Stiegler's view, is to produce 'negentropy', which is defined as a capacity to reduce the effect of entropy and (10) A conditional contributive revenue (revenu contributif conditionel), which would work similarly to the revenue obtained by entertainment workers in France, was proposed by Ars Industrialis to provide support to any person performing an activity producing societal value by contributing, for example, to improving peoples' capabilities.…”

Configuring Spaces for Constructive Debates

“…Analyzing the creative process, they underscore that firms -designated as upperground -cannot directly absorb the knowledge of creative skilled individuals who constitute the underground. The middle ground play a key role in creative process in cities because these creative communities integrate, transfer and transform the knowledge of the underground so that it can be used by the upperground (Cohendet et al, 2010;Béraud et al, 2012;Grandadam et al, 2013;Capdevila, 2015). In summary, different spaces are likely to interact to generate innovation.…”