2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08927-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Open versus minimally invasive small bowel resection for Crohn’s disease: a NSQIP retrospective review and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the open assisted approach of extracorporeal Kono‐S anastomosis, although differences between countries and local protocols in hospitalization make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. A minimally invasive approach in CD has been previously suggested to result in a shorter hospital stay compared with an open approach [27]. Celentano et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the open assisted approach of extracorporeal Kono‐S anastomosis, although differences between countries and local protocols in hospitalization make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. A minimally invasive approach in CD has been previously suggested to result in a shorter hospital stay compared with an open approach [27]. Celentano et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the open assisted approach of extracorporeal Kono-S anastomosis, although differences between countries and local protocols in hospitalization make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. A minimally invasive approach in CD has been previously suggested to result in a shorter hospital stay compared with an open approach[27]. Celentano et al[28] also report older age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥3 or administration of preoperative total parental nutrition (TPN) as risk factors for prolonged hospitalization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[120][121][122] For small bowel resection, a retrospective review revealed that laparoscopic surgery is associated with an equivalent or improved morbidity over open surgery in select patients with small bowel CD. 123 In summary, retrospective studies and randomized studies have indicated that laparoscopic approaches for patients with CD are both safe and feasible. The choice of laparoscopic or open approaches depends on patient factors, surgeon preference, and equipment availability.…”
Section: Laparoscopic Surgery In CDmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in recurrent complicated cases, several studies have reported that laparoscopic ileocolic resection can be performed in carefully selected patients and has comparable outcomes to primary laparoscopic resection 120–122 . For small bowel resection, a retrospective review revealed that laparoscopic surgery is associated with an equivalent or improved morbidity over open surgery in select patients with small bowel CD 123 …”
Section: Advances In Operative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation