2012
DOI: 10.1177/1365480212450235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opening doors for bilingual students: Recommendations for building linguistically responsive schools

Abstract: In this article, we outline the necessary action steps for schools to improve the achievement of bilingual students. We review, summarize, and utilize the pertinent scholarly literature to make suggestions for school-wide, collaborative efforts to support the achievement of bilingual learners through linguistically responsive pedagogy and practice. Our research-based recommendations include the need for school actors to negotiate language policy and mandates, lay the necessary ideological foundations, build ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the theme of immigration (Gregor & Green, 2011), literature circle participants collaboratively explored themes and ideas specific to linguistically diverse students, such as (a) students' social and emotional uncertainties about learning and not learning English when starting in U.S. schools, as reflected in teachers' dialog about Amada (Pérez, 2009), (b) students' and families' social and emotional circumstances related to immigration, such as discrimination and extended time away from families and friends, as represented in various texts (Anzaldua, 1997;Medina, 2001;Pérez, 2009), (c) students' and families' negotiation of cultural differences between schools in their native countries and in the U.S., as exhibited in discourse about Jorge (Medina, 2001), (d) students' complex roles as translators and language brokers and the corresponding benefits and demands, emergent from the conversation about Shota (Bateson-Hill, 2001), and (e) teachers' deficit-based perspectives that can pervade expectations of ELs, as well as the importance of native language support and assessment in academic instruction, exhibited in responses to culturally relevant poetry (Medina, 2001). By utilizing texts that highlight the perspective of the linguistically diverse child, teachers explore the social, emotional, cultural, and linguistic dimensions of children and families (Heineke et al, 2012;Wrigley, 2000) that get overshadowed in the staunch focus on academics in contemporary educational settings (Herrera, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the theme of immigration (Gregor & Green, 2011), literature circle participants collaboratively explored themes and ideas specific to linguistically diverse students, such as (a) students' social and emotional uncertainties about learning and not learning English when starting in U.S. schools, as reflected in teachers' dialog about Amada (Pérez, 2009), (b) students' and families' social and emotional circumstances related to immigration, such as discrimination and extended time away from families and friends, as represented in various texts (Anzaldua, 1997;Medina, 2001;Pérez, 2009), (c) students' and families' negotiation of cultural differences between schools in their native countries and in the U.S., as exhibited in discourse about Jorge (Medina, 2001), (d) students' complex roles as translators and language brokers and the corresponding benefits and demands, emergent from the conversation about Shota (Bateson-Hill, 2001), and (e) teachers' deficit-based perspectives that can pervade expectations of ELs, as well as the importance of native language support and assessment in academic instruction, exhibited in responses to culturally relevant poetry (Medina, 2001). By utilizing texts that highlight the perspective of the linguistically diverse child, teachers explore the social, emotional, cultural, and linguistic dimensions of children and families (Heineke et al, 2012;Wrigley, 2000) that get overshadowed in the staunch focus on academics in contemporary educational settings (Herrera, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven million students in the U.S., or 20 percent of national school enrollment, speak a language other than English at home; about one-half of these students do not speak English well enough to be considered fluent (U.S. Department of Education, USDOE, 2010). Educators must be prepared to support the social, emotional, cultural, linguistic, and academic development of English learners (ELs) in classrooms and schools (Heineke, Coleman, Ferrell, & Kersemeier, 2012;Wrigley, 2000). Nevertheless, under-prepared teachers educate the large majority of ELs in the U.S. (Cohen & Clewell, 2007).…”
Section: Dialoging About English Learners: Preparing Teachers Throughmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there are many differences among children who fall into the homogenous EL category, researchers have identified several commonalities that have implications for educational achievement (Heineke, Coleman, Ferrell, & Kersemeier, 2012;Herrera, 2010;Howard, Paéz, August, Barr, Kenyon, & Malabonga, 2014;Leung & Uchikoshi, 2012;Wrigley, 2000). Specifically, ELs are more likely to have parents with lower formal education levels than their non-EL counterparts (Capps, Fix, Murray, Ost, Passel, & Hewantoro, 2005) and to come from low-income, immigrant families (Garcia & Cuellar, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Review English Learners and Their Parentsmentioning
confidence: 99%