2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

openPSTD: The open source pseudospectral time-domain method for acoustic propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elston's PSTD approach, while an order of magnitude improvement on finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods, is numerically intensive; requiring simulation grid spacing of two nodes per wavelength, it is not suitable for applications requiring real-time responses over survey scale distances. Alternative GPU enabled PSTD implementations also do not meet real-time [15] but have benefit when applied to short-range ultrasonic modelling or near-field transducer beamforming investigations [16]. Early iterations of this work achieved real-time in comparison to Bell's model when benchmarked on off-the-shelf PC hardware but are limited to 2D ray tracing (i.e., infinitesimally narrow acrosstrack beam patterns) and restricted scenario sizes.…”
Section: Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elston's PSTD approach, while an order of magnitude improvement on finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods, is numerically intensive; requiring simulation grid spacing of two nodes per wavelength, it is not suitable for applications requiring real-time responses over survey scale distances. Alternative GPU enabled PSTD implementations also do not meet real-time [15] but have benefit when applied to short-range ultrasonic modelling or near-field transducer beamforming investigations [16]. Early iterations of this work achieved real-time in comparison to Bell's model when benchmarked on off-the-shelf PC hardware but are limited to 2D ray tracing (i.e., infinitesimally narrow acrosstrack beam patterns) and restricted scenario sizes.…”
Section: Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel wave-based solvers are used in a multitude of scientific domains, including the studying of seismic, electromagnetic, and acoustic waves. A large category of these solvers are parallel FDTD solvers either for large clusters [17,43,47,48] or for GPUs [31,36,40,41,45,35,19]. A category of parallel methods are also based on finite-element schemes [13,5].…”
Section: Parallel Wave-based Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method (FEM) [1][2][3][4][5], boundary element method (BEM) [6], and finite difference time domain (FDTD) [7][8][9] method exemplify the often-used numerical methods for room acoustic simulations. Although they entail a huge computational effort for acoustic simulations especially at kilohertz frequencies in a real-sized room, their application to room acoustics prediction is increasing gradually by virtue of the progress of computer technology and the continuous development of efficient methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In addition, some recent studies [16,18,22,25] use extended-reaction boundary conditions to address both the frequency dependent and incident-angle dependent absorption characteristics of sound absorbers accurately, whereas many studies use the simplest local-reaction boundary conditions, which simplify the incident-angle dependence of surface impedance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%