“…Among emerging energy storage systems like sodium-ion batteries, potassium-ion batteries, and lithium–sulfur batteries, sodium–sulfur (Na–S) batteries are very promising to become a good alternative of LIBs, as Na–S batteries not only integrate high elemental abundance and inexpensive prices of both elemental Na and S but also exhibit outstanding theoretical energy densities of 1274 W h kg –1 based the final product Na 2 S, which is relatively lower than that of Li–S batteries (2600 W h kg –1 , the final product is Li 2 S) but higher than that of LIBs. , The sodium–sulfur batteries are usually classified into high-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries (150–350 °C), intermediate-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries (150–200 °C), and room-temperature sodium–sulfur (RT Na–S) batteries (25–60 °C), according to the range of operating temperatures. − The high-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries possess high theoretical energy densities but bring in huge and uncontrollable safety hazards, possibly leading to a fire and even explosion. , Although the intermediate temperatures are able to lower the safety risks to some extent, the safety risks cannot be completely eliminated, and there still exists much possibility to trigger unforeseen accidents, as the metallic Na anode is present in the molten state at such temperatures . In contrast, RT Na–S batteries can avert the safety issues through adopting ambient operation temperatures as well as offering an energy density considerably higher than those of the high temperature and intermediate temperature.…”