2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operationalizing authentic mathematical proof activity using disciplinary tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems apparent that further strengthening of this themes' internal bonds may be achieved by developing respective frameworks that can be utilized in different abstract algebra contexts. One example of such a framework has recently been published by Melhuish et al (2022)-the Authentic Mathematical Proof Activity (AMPA) framework has been developed to help analyzing and documenting mathematical activity in proof-based settings and to expand "what competency can look like in the undergraduate mathematics classroom" (Melhuish et al, 2022, p. 28).…”
Section: Discussion Of Science Mapping Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems apparent that further strengthening of this themes' internal bonds may be achieved by developing respective frameworks that can be utilized in different abstract algebra contexts. One example of such a framework has recently been published by Melhuish et al (2022)-the Authentic Mathematical Proof Activity (AMPA) framework has been developed to help analyzing and documenting mathematical activity in proof-based settings and to expand "what competency can look like in the undergraduate mathematics classroom" (Melhuish et al, 2022, p. 28).…”
Section: Discussion Of Science Mapping Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Fisher (2018), mathematicians use different strategies when reading scholarly texts than do historians or chemists. Some other scientific studies have also revealed that the ways of reading scientific texts by disciplinary experts are specific to the given discipline (Burton, Morgan, 2000;Shanahan Shanahan, 2008;Johnson, Watson, 2011;Mejia-Ramos, Weber, 2014;Melhuish et al, 2022).…”
Section: Reading In Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%