Operationalizing the net-negative carbon economy

Abstract

The remaining carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius will probably be exhausted within this decade 1 , 2 . Carbon debt 3 generated thereafter will need to be compensated by net-negative emissions 4 . However, economic policy instruments to guarantee potentially very costly net carbon dioxide removal (CDR) have not yet been devised. Here we propose intertemporal instruments to provide the basis for widely applied carbon taxes and emission trading systems to finance a net-negative carbon economy 5 . We investigate an idealized market approach to incentivize the repayment of previously accrued carbon debt by establishing the responsibility of emitters for the net removal of carbon dioxide through ‘carbon removal obligations’ (CROs). Inherent risks, such as the risk of default by carbon debtors, are addressed by pricing atmospheric CO 2 storage through interest on carbon debt. In contrast to the prevailing literature on emission pathways, we find that interest payments for CROs induce substantially more-ambitious near-term decarbonization that is complemented by earlier and less-aggressive deployment of CDR. We conclude that CROs will need to become an integral part of the global climate policy mix if we are to ensure the viability of ambitious climate targets and an equitable distribution of mitigation efforts across generations.

Inoculating against the spread of Islamophobic and radical-Islamist disinformation

“…The idea of using the recommender system to deploy public-service messages is therefore not far fetched. On the contrary, given that we live in “algorithmically infused societies who are shaped by deeply entangled algorithmic and human processes and behaviour” (Wagner et al, 2021 , p. 197), harnessing such algorithms in the public interest should be of increasing interest to the social sciences. At a time when regulation of social media is increasingly being entertained by policy makers, in particular in the European Union (e.g.…”

International Trade as a Double-Edged Sword: The Perspective of Carbon Emissions

“…Carbon emissions can also be calculated through an accounting framework with investment-based methods (Zhang, et al, 2020). Moreover, intertemporal mechanisms were provided by Bednar et al (2021) to encourage countries to take responsibility for carbon emissions in the international trade market. Adnan et al ( 2021) used second-and third-panel cointegration methods, and the results indicated that cross-sectional dependency and heterogeneity confirm the correlations among panels in the study.…”

Realizing ambitions: A framework for iteratively assessing and communicating national decarbonization progress

“…(2021) did not assess the availability of needed raw materials, Li et al. (2022) did not consider manufacturing capabilities needed to exploit natural resource endowments, and Bednar et al. (2021) failed to consider financial investment gaps.…”