2005
DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-200053578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Induced Variability in Cardiovascular MR: Left Ventricular Measurements and Their Reproducibility

Abstract: Our study confirms the excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility of the cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements of the left ventricular volumes and mass in a group of healthy volunteers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
54
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These variables also showed the smallest variation for interobserver variability. The results of intraand interobserver variability analysis in this study are comparable to the results of other studies with SSFP for all variables (6,(25)(26)(27)(28). Therefore, CMR imaging is an accurate and reliable method for follow-up of these variables and can adequately assess changes in ventricular size and global ventricular performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These variables also showed the smallest variation for interobserver variability. The results of intraand interobserver variability analysis in this study are comparable to the results of other studies with SSFP for all variables (6,(25)(26)(27)(28). Therefore, CMR imaging is an accurate and reliable method for follow-up of these variables and can adequately assess changes in ventricular size and global ventricular performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The consistency of manual CMR planning was reported in Ref. 24. According to the same criterion, the intraoperator planning accuracy was 2.67°Ϯ 1.5°.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…An experienced operator would not have much difficulty in identifying the important anatomical landmarks, such as the apex and atrioventricular ring, and aligning the first and last imaging planes of the SA stack with these landmarks. Additionally, the average angular deviation of the LV axis from the optimal orientation amounts to 2.67°and may be considered negligible (24). However, in automated CMR planning the first and last imaging planes of the SA stack do not always coincide with the apex and mitral valve, and the average angular deviation of the LV axis is considerably larger (7.13°) than that in manual planning (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations