2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01580-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Inference of Non-Markovian Terms for Learning Reduced Models from Partially Observed State Trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The governing PDE is spatially discretized using n = 500 grid points leading to a discretized state y ∈ R 1000 . The FOM is numerically integrated for total time T = 10 using the implicit midpoint rule (40), a symplectic method, with ∆t = 0.01. To propagate the system forward in time, we need to solve a system of 2n = 1000 linear equations at every time step.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The governing PDE is spatially discretized using n = 500 grid points leading to a discretized state y ∈ R 1000 . The FOM is numerically integrated for total time T = 10 using the implicit midpoint rule (40), a symplectic method, with ∆t = 0.01. To propagate the system forward in time, we need to solve a system of 2n = 1000 linear equations at every time step.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach has also been extended to a grey-box setting in [38] where analytical expressions for the nonpolynomial nonlinear terms are known and the remaining operators are learned via operator inference. Convergence and accuracy certificates were developed in [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the philosophy of inducing time-dependent shifts into the ROM framework, we extend the non-intrusive projection-based operator inference ROM framework [43] towards advectiondominated systems by transforming the dynamics to a moving coordinate frame. Standard operator inference has successfully been applied to diverse applications such as combustion [57,34], chemical reactors [10], ocean flows [61], Hamiltonian systems [55] and general reaction systems in the presence of incomplete data [59]. Since operator inference learns the operators that would be obtained through intrusive Galerkin projection (which can be done exactly with additional data pre-processing, see [42]) it inherits problems that intrusive Galerkin ROMs face in the presence of strong advection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, estimation of dynamic structures under partial observability is an important problem due to its generality and to potential applications (cf. Menda et al [2020], Tsiamis and Pappas [2019], Tsiamis et al [2020], Lale et al [2020], Lee [2022], Adams et al [2021], Bhouri and Perdikaris [2021], Ouala et al [2020], Uy and Peherstorfer [2021], Subramanian et al [2022], Bennett and Kallus [2021], Lee et al [2020]). Inheriting accumulated results of the controls literature, most of the work on provably correct methods for partially observed dynamical systems consider additive Gaussian noise and controllable/observable linear system; some work further adds restrictions on spectral radius of the linear system to be strictly less than one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%