2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2003.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator-scheduling using a constraint satisfaction technique in port container terminals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1). The values of the objective function for the GA-optimized schedule and the manually-adjusted schedule are 0.03 and 0.13, respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(1). The values of the objective function for the GA-optimized schedule and the manually-adjusted schedule are 0.03 and 0.13, respectively.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [1] had collected an actual operator-scheduling problem from a container terminal in Pusan, Korea, and defined the operator-scheduling problem as a constraint-satisfaction problem. Its solution was obtained by utilizing a commercial software.…”
Section: B Operator Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The choice of solution procedure depends on the preferences of the terminal operator and the distinct characteristics of the terminal. Finally, when looking at operational decisions, the majority of scientific articles suggest the use of optimisation techniques (e.g., Gambardella et al, 2001;Kim et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%