1982
DOI: 10.2307/1999205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator-Self-Similar Processes in a Finite-Dimensional Space

Abstract: Abstract.A general representation for an operator-self-similar process is obtained and its class of exponents is characterized. It is shown that such a process is the limit in a certain sense of an operator-normed process and any limit of an operator-normed process is operator-self-similar.1. Introduction. In 1962 Lamperti [8] introduced the notion of a self-similar process, {X(t): t s* 0), taking values in a real finite-dimensional inner product space T. A stochastic process {X(t)} is called self-similar (s.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For R n -valued OSS processes, a connection between this class of processes and operator-stable probability measures has been observed by the authors of [4]. Their idea extends to Banach space valued processes as follows.…”
Section: Definition 13mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For R n -valued OSS processes, a connection between this class of processes and operator-stable probability measures has been observed by the authors of [4]. Their idea extends to Banach space valued processes as follows.…”
Section: Definition 13mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4) In order that the inequalities above hold we also require that the OSS processes have a norm-continuous expectation-function t → E(X(t)), t > 0. The main ingredient in the proof of the theorem is the fact that OSS processes whose expectations span a dense linear subspace of the whole space have a unique scaling family of operators which is necessarily a multiplicative group of operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.2 Theorem 6 in Hudson and Mason (1982) shows that every maximal symmetry o.s.s. process has an exponent of the form h I, h ∈ R. For the case of OFBMs, the proof of Theorem 4.1 retrieves this result (see expression (4.5)).…”
Section: Theorem 41 Consider An Ofbm Given By the Spectral Representmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such issues are strongly connected. Since the fundamental work of Hudson and Mason (1982), it is well known that one given o.s.s. process X may have multiple exponents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X = {X(t)} t≥0 be a Lévy process in R d starting from 0 such that the distribution of X(t) is full for every t > 0. Hudson and Mason [10,Theorem 7] proved that X is operator self-similar if and only if the distribution of X(1), ν := P • (X(1)) −1 , is strictly operator stable. In this case, every stability exponent B of ν is also a self-similarity exponent of X.…”
Section: Now We Derive the Lower Bound For Dim P X([0 1]) It Follomentioning
confidence: 99%