2009
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.2009.v6.p72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Splitting for Three-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media

Abstract: We describe an operator splitting technique based on physics rather than on dimension for the numerical solution of a nonlinear system of partial differential equations which models three-phase flow through heterogeneous porous media. The model for three-phase flow considered in this work takes into account capillary forces, general relations for the relative permeability functions and variable porosity and permeability fields. In our numerical procedure a high resolution, nonoscillatory, second order, conserv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
33
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…During saturation time steps in which we do not solve for the velocity, we find a velocity field by extrapolation from the previous two available velocity solutions. A similar method is described by Abreu et al in [1] where the pressure system is only solved once per fixed number of saturation time steps. A better approach would let the length of the macro time steps depend adaptively on the changes incurred in the saturation since the last update.…”
Section: Adaptive Operator Splitting and Time Steppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During saturation time steps in which we do not solve for the velocity, we find a velocity field by extrapolation from the previous two available velocity solutions. A similar method is described by Abreu et al in [1] where the pressure system is only solved once per fixed number of saturation time steps. A better approach would let the length of the macro time steps depend adaptively on the changes incurred in the saturation since the last update.…”
Section: Adaptive Operator Splitting and Time Steppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have previously been developed (see, for example, [1,18,19]) but with a fixed number of saturation time steps between each solution of the flow field. We will here make the timing of solving the flow equations adaptive using a new a posteriori criterion (see Theorem 3.1 below) relating the change in the velocity to the change in the saturation since the flow equations were solved last.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the computational wall time can be significantly reduced if the pressure is solved only when necessary. Such ideas have been pursued with solving the pressure equation once per fixed number of time steps [1] or utilizing the particular form of elliptic equations [8]. In this work we explore an adaptive indicator of the pressure equation, driven by a user defined tolerance δ * , and use this indicator along with a projective pressure estimation to estimate the pressure for cases where an exact solver is not required.…”
Section: Projective Pressure Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods for determining the constitutive relations of capillary pressure curves can be found within the petroleum engineering literature, see e.g., Bentsen and Anli (1976), Hilfer (2006), Thomeer (1960). In flow modeling communities, these relations have been incorporated into numerical models which allow for capillary effects (Abreu et al 2008(Abreu et al , 2009Douglas et al 1997). Because of the difficulty in obtaining numerical solutions of the governing equations in a fully implicit manner, operator splitting methods have been shown to be suitable techniques for solving the partial differential equations (Abreu et al 2008(Abreu et al , 2009Douglas et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In flow modeling communities, these relations have been incorporated into numerical models which allow for capillary effects (Abreu et al 2008(Abreu et al , 2009Douglas et al 1997). Because of the difficulty in obtaining numerical solutions of the governing equations in a fully implicit manner, operator splitting methods have been shown to be suitable techniques for solving the partial differential equations (Abreu et al 2008(Abreu et al , 2009Douglas et al 1997). Such methods typically involve splitting the governing equations into three separate parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%