2013
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ophthalmic statistics note 1: unit of analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid statistical problems with independent sampling, we selected only one eye for data collection: the eye with the best image quality, and if of equal quality then the right eye [13]. Images were examined in Heidelberg Eye Explorer 1.9.10.0 (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid statistical problems with independent sampling, we selected only one eye for data collection: the eye with the best image quality, and if of equal quality then the right eye [13]. Images were examined in Heidelberg Eye Explorer 1.9.10.0 (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Comparisons between groups or variables were performed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis H-test, and correlations in cross tables were derived using the Pearson's Χ 2 -test. To correct for multiple testing, we adjusted all P-values following Eye the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 An important issue in ophthalmology research is that a substantial number of articles in ophthalmology journals give the study outcomes in either eye of a study patient as an independent data point. Although this important limitation was highlighted in a number of publications, [3][4][5][6][7] we had the observation that such improper statistical testing still continued to appear even in high-impact-factor journals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%