2016
DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i2.1539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinions of Hospital Pharmacists in Canada Regarding Marijuana for Medical Purposes

Abstract: <p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Canada’s most recent Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations have changed the way in which patients access marijuana. Furthermore, if authorized by the person in charge of the hospital, a pharmacist practising in a hospital may now place orders with licensed producers for dried marijuana for in-hospital use by patients. As use of this product increases, hospital pharmacists may have an increased role in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a lack of standardization of products as well as constant changes in legislation and regulation, it is difficult for patients, dog owners, health care providers, and veterinarians to acquire accurate information about the pain relief potential of cannabis products (Kogan et al 2019a(Kogan et al , 2019bMitchell et al 2016). As a result, people are choosing cannabis products even though very few reported that their health care professional or veterinarian recommended them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a lack of standardization of products as well as constant changes in legislation and regulation, it is difficult for patients, dog owners, health care providers, and veterinarians to acquire accurate information about the pain relief potential of cannabis products (Kogan et al 2019a(Kogan et al , 2019bMitchell et al 2016). As a result, people are choosing cannabis products even though very few reported that their health care professional or veterinarian recommended them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2146] A flow diagram of study selection is shown in Fig 1. Of the 26 studies included, 13 were conducted in the United States (US),[22, 2528, 30, 33, 37, 38, 4043] four were conducted in Canada,[23, 32, 39, 45] three were conducted in Australia[34–36] and Israel,[21, 31, 46] two were conducted in Ireland,[29, 44] and one covered an international sample. [24] There were 18 studies that sampled medical practitioners,[21, 2426, 2832, 34, 36, 37, 4042, 4446] and three studies that sampled pharmacists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] There were 18 studies that sampled medical practitioners,[21, 2426, 2832, 34, 36, 37, 4042, 4446] and three studies that sampled pharmacists. [33, 35, 39] An additional five studies included in this review were grouped according to the high proportion of nursing professionals sampled. [22, 23, 27, 38, 43] One study sampled exclusively nurse practitioners[23] while the other four studies sampled a mixed cohort of medical and allied health professionals of which nurses were the predominant population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations