Opportunities and Challenges for Human-Machine Teaming in Cybersecurity Operations

Paul, Organizer: Celeste Lyn; Blaha, Panelists: Leslie M.; Fallon, Corey K.; González, Cleotilde; Gutzwiller, Robert S.

doi:10.1177/1071181319631079

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Issues of computer security and privacy are fundamentally related to peoples' needs, goals, beliefs, and interactions. This group has previously examined sponsor perspectives (Gutzwiller, Cosley, Ferguson-Walter, Fraze, & Rahmer, 2019) and human-machine teaming (Paul, Blaha, Fallon, Gonzalez, & Gutzwiller, 2019), but the intersection of cybersecurity and human concerns is vast ( Gutzwiller, Fugate, Sawyer, & Hancock, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Humans and Technology for Inclusive Privacy and Security

Das

Gutzwiller

Roscoe

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computer security and user privacy are critical issues and concerns in the digital era due to both increasing users and threats to their data. Separate issues arise between generic cybersecurity guidance (i.e., protect all user data from malicious threats) and the individualistic approach of privacy (i.e., specific to users and dependent on user needs and risk perceptions). Research has shown that several security- and privacy-focused vulnerabilities are technological (e.g., software bugs (Streiff, Kenny, Das, Leeth, & Camp, 2018), insecure authentication (Das, Wang, Tingle, & Camp, 2019)), or behavioral (e.g., sharing passwords (Das, Dingman, & Camp, 2018); and compliance (Das, Dev, & Srinivasan, 2018) (Dev, Das, Rashidi, & Camp, 2019)). This panel proposal addresses a third category of sociotechnical vulnerabilities that can and sometimes do arise from non-inclusive design of security and privacy. In this panel, we will address users’ needs and desires for privacy. The panel will engage in in-depth discussions about value-sensitive design while focusing on potentially vulnerable populations, such as older adults, teens, persons with disabilities, and others who are not typically emphasized in general security and privacy concerns. Human factors have a stake in and ability to facilitate improvements in these areas.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Humans and Technology for Inclusive Privacy and Security

Das

Gutzwiller

Roscoe

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…HATs leverage a state of interdependence to benefit from their complementary relationships (Johnson & Vera, 2019) and combine the diverse capabilities of organic and non-organic team members by distributing the necessary actions to achieve a task among both types of team members (Cooke et al, 2020;Lyons et al, 2021;Roth et al, 2019). Example domains that encompass HATs include healthcare (Endsley et al, 2022), aviation (Rieth et al, 2021) and cybersecurity (Hauptman et al, 2023;Lyn Paul et al, 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%