2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposing effects of acute and chronic d-amphetamine on decision-making in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dopamine depletion in this structure drastically reduces engagement in instrumental responding (Nicola, 2010), and NACc neurons encode nearby manipulanda and presumably support approach (Morrison et al, 2015). Moreover, infusion of amphetamine into NACc increased EFS (Wong et al, 2017a), consistent with reports that this manipulation increases Pavlovian conditioned approach (Parkinson et al, 1999; du Hoffmann and Nicola, 2014). It was thus surprising that lesions of NACc in this study did not decrease EFS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dopamine depletion in this structure drastically reduces engagement in instrumental responding (Nicola, 2010), and NACc neurons encode nearby manipulanda and presumably support approach (Morrison et al, 2015). Moreover, infusion of amphetamine into NACc increased EFS (Wong et al, 2017a), consistent with reports that this manipulation increases Pavlovian conditioned approach (Parkinson et al, 1999; du Hoffmann and Nicola, 2014). It was thus surprising that lesions of NACc in this study did not decrease EFS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…EFS is modulated by drugs such as d -amphetamine (Wong et al, 2017a), but not others such as Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Wong et al, 2017b). Moreover, it appears to be sexually dimorphic in rats and may be subject to modulation by stress, inflammation, or other factors (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sams-Dodd, 1998), an effect we observed here. Moreover, AMPH has been shown to decrease 582 feeding (Foltin, 2001;Shoblock et al, 2003;Cannon et al, 2004;Wellman et al, 2009) and 583 sensitivity to reward omission (Wong et al, 2017). Consistent with these data, we found that 584 animals spent less time at feeders, and were more likely to forgo the reward, as AMPH 585 increased.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, the disruptions in omission likely reflected a true attentional deficit. Psychostimulants, such as amphetamine ( Wong et al, 2016 ), cocaine ( Dandy and Gatch, 2009 ), and nicotine ( Kirshenbaum et al, 2011 ), had been reported to affect impulsive behavior. Acute morphine was found to cause dose-dependent increases in premature responding and decreases in perseverative responding on 5-CSRTT ( Pattij et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%