2002
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00105.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposing effects of PKCα and PKCε on basolateral membrane dynamics in intestinal epithelia

Abstract: PKC is a critical effector of plasma membrane dynamics, yet the mechanism and isoform-specific role of PKC are poorly understood. We recently showed that the phorbol ester PMA (100 nM) induces prompt activation of the novel isoform PKCepsilon followed by late activation of the conventional isoform PKCalpha in T84 intestinal epithelia. PMA also elicited biphasic effects on endocytosis, characterized by an initial stimulatory phase followed by an inhibitory phase. Activation of PKCepsilon was shown to be respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, at the beginning of the process, when the cPKCs were present in the cytoplasm, their roles in the control of GVBD differed according to the isoform: for instance, PKC-α was not involved in this process whereas PKC-βI and PKC-γ prevented GVBD and PKC-βII promoted it. Our data are consistent with several reports describing the antagonistic effects of various cPKC isoforms on the regulation of biological functions in other cell types (Chen and Mochly-Rosen, 2001;Efendiev et al, 1999;Gusovsky and Gutkind, 1991;Rosales et al, 1998;Song et al, 2002). For example, for the cPKC family, PKC-βI and PKC-βII have been shown to have opposite effects in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (Yamamoto et al, 1998).…”
Section: Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Cpkc And Meiosis Resumptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On one hand, at the beginning of the process, when the cPKCs were present in the cytoplasm, their roles in the control of GVBD differed according to the isoform: for instance, PKC-α was not involved in this process whereas PKC-βI and PKC-γ prevented GVBD and PKC-βII promoted it. Our data are consistent with several reports describing the antagonistic effects of various cPKC isoforms on the regulation of biological functions in other cell types (Chen and Mochly-Rosen, 2001;Efendiev et al, 1999;Gusovsky and Gutkind, 1991;Rosales et al, 1998;Song et al, 2002). For example, for the cPKC family, PKC-βI and PKC-βII have been shown to have opposite effects in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (Yamamoto et al, 1998).…”
Section: Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Cpkc And Meiosis Resumptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Interestingly, in contrast to PKCa expression, the protein level of PKCe showed an inverse relationship to that of Ets1 ( Figure 2d). As has been reported for intestinal epithelial cells (Song et al, 2002), PKCa and PKCe may have opposing effects in cancer cells. Collectively, these data suggest that, in different types of cancer cells, PKCa regulates the expression of Ets1.…”
Section: Suppression Of Endogenous Pkca Expression Results In Downregsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…systems, including glioma cell migration (26) and basolateral membrane dynamics in intestinal epithelia (27). However, the current study is the first to demonstrate that PKC␣ and PKC⑀ can oppose one another through their opposite effects on the MEK/ERK signaling cascade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%