2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24880-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposing effects of selectivity and invariance in peripheral vision

Abstract: Sensory processing necessitates discarding some information in service of preserving and reformatting more behaviorally relevant information. Sensory neurons seem to achieve this by responding selectively to particular combinations of features in their inputs, while averaging over or ignoring irrelevant combinations. Here, we expose the perceptual implications of this tradeoff between selectivity and invariance, using stimuli and tasks that explicitly reveal their opposing effects on discrimination performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this conclusion could be challenged based on the finding of better 3D orientation discrimination using V3A than CIP responses (Elmore et al, 2019). The current findings corroborated that result but also reconciled the apparent contradiction by revealing a tradeoff between selectivity and invariance as visual information ascended the pathway (Ziemba and Simoncelli, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, this conclusion could be challenged based on the finding of better 3D orientation discrimination using V3A than CIP responses (Elmore et al, 2019). The current findings corroborated that result but also reconciled the apparent contradiction by revealing a tradeoff between selectivity and invariance as visual information ascended the pathway (Ziemba and Simoncelli, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To quantify the extent to which image features set the limits of naturalness discrimination, we built a model observer that measures the task-relevance of the texture statistics within each set of apertured images. Image aperturing led to a small amount of drift in each image’s texture statistics, such that different images synthesized to have the same naturalness could differ slightly in their statistics (Ziemba et al, 2018; Ziemba & Simoncelli, 2021). The model observer’s sensitivity corresponds to the naturalness level at which texture statistics are no longer a reliable cue for discrimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image aperturing led to a small amount of drift in each image's texture statistics, such that different images synthesized to have the same naturalness could differ slightly in their statistics (Ziemba et al, 2018;Ziemba & Simoncelli, 2021). The model observer's sensitivity corresponds to the naturalness level at which texture statistics are no longer a reliable cue for discrimination.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that studies that model complex feature selectivity as a joint response dependence among V1-like units, whether physiologically (Freeman et al, 2013) or perceptually (Keshvari and Rosenholtz, 2016), do not incorporate any of the known spatial nonlinearities in V1 responses in their models (e.g., divisive surround suppression). Recent work has shown that the incorporation of these nonlinearities is critical for understanding spatial contextual effects on perception, including crowding (Henry and Kohn, 2020;Ziemba and Simoncelli, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%