2007
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposite Evolutionary Effects between Different Alternative Splicing Patterns

Abstract: Alternative splicing (AS) has been recognized as a mechanism of relaxing selection pressure on protein subsequences. Here, we show that AS may also yield contrary evolutionary effects. We compare the evolutionary rates of 2 types of alternatively spliced exons (ASEs)-simple and complex. The former does not change the boundaries of its flanking exons, whereas the latter does. By analyzing over 26,000 human-mouse orthologous exons, we demonstrate that complex ASEs have lower Ka and Ka/Ks ratio and higher Ks than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When ASEs are classified as conserved or non-conserved in exon structure, low synonymous rates are characteristic of conserved ASEs but not of those with non-conserved exonic structure [26]. Moreover, when they are classified as boundary-shifting (complex) ASEs or non-boundary shifting (simple) ASEs (those of the former type change the exon/intron boundaries of the flanking exons whereas those of the latter type do not), complex ASEs are under stronger selection pressure at the amino acid level but less pressure at the RNA level than CSEs, while reverse trends were observed in simple ASEs [27,28]. These opposite evolutionary effects between different AS patterns have been discussed as a key role of AS in the 'switch-like' regulation of gene expression [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ASEs are classified as conserved or non-conserved in exon structure, low synonymous rates are characteristic of conserved ASEs but not of those with non-conserved exonic structure [26]. Moreover, when they are classified as boundary-shifting (complex) ASEs or non-boundary shifting (simple) ASEs (those of the former type change the exon/intron boundaries of the flanking exons whereas those of the latter type do not), complex ASEs are under stronger selection pressure at the amino acid level but less pressure at the RNA level than CSEs, while reverse trends were observed in simple ASEs [27,28]. These opposite evolutionary effects between different AS patterns have been discussed as a key role of AS in the 'switch-like' regulation of gene expression [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ASEs are known to have increased d N and the d N / d S ratios as compared with CSEs [8,10,18,19]. Therefore, the increase in d N and the d N / d S ratio in longer exons might have resulted from an increase in the proportion of ASEs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The splicing sites that enabled the identified transcript to pass the CENTP exon-checking rules stated above and generate the longest transcript were then chosen. Note that, in the CENTP process, if a meta-CENTP exon had been identified as a simple cassette-on exon, it was not further examined for consideration of a complex exon, for simple exons constitute the majority of cassette exons (>80%) (Chen and Chuang 2007;Chen et al 2007a). For accuracy, we only identified complex cassette-on exons that were located in CDSs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%