2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36546-1_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposition Differential Evolution Based Method for Text Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This summarizer uses term frequencies to calculate the relative importance of each sentence in a document. It is widely used in related studies [43,44,45,46,47] as a benchmark method for automatic summarisation systems.…”
Section: Comparison With Benchmark Methods and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This summarizer uses term frequencies to calculate the relative importance of each sentence in a document. It is widely used in related studies [43,44,45,46,47] as a benchmark method for automatic summarisation systems.…”
Section: Comparison With Benchmark Methods and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of today's implemented extractive summarizers adopt sentence scoring or graph-based sentence ranking. Prevailing sentence scoring and selection techniques in text summarization include graph-based representation [52], text semantic analysis [3], semantic similarity [5], sentence clustering [53], fuzzy reasoning [44,49], sentence regression [55] and differential evolution [46,54]. Several related works conducted a comparative study on a range of sentence scoring methods by examining the performance of their combinations for text summarization [51,52].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the top-weighted sentence in every cluster is picked out to form the summary until a user-preferred summary length is met. An evolutionary algorithm called Differential Evolution algorithm was also used to optimize data clustering process and could increase the quality of the generated text summaries (Abuobieda et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Cluster Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that all evaluation scores extracted using ROUGE ate statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval [17]. For result analysis, all measures were used to evaluate the methods performance, with special attention to f-measure due it balances both recall and precision scores.…”
Section: B Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%