1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(73)80086-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and chemical investigations on fuel-rich methane-oxygen premixed flames at atmospheric pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A linear change in gain setting on the camera changes the actual gain constant exponentially; thus, the ratio in calibration constant is not linear. The value of the soot absorption function, E(m), used for comparison with the work of Shaddix [9,10], is assumed to be 0.26, based on an estimated value of the index of refraction m = 1.57 − 0.56i by D'Alessio et al [57]. However, as discussed above, the particular value of the constant is not important for the comparisons, but only for the absolute value obtained of the soot volume fraction.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A linear change in gain setting on the camera changes the actual gain constant exponentially; thus, the ratio in calibration constant is not linear. The value of the soot absorption function, E(m), used for comparison with the work of Shaddix [9,10], is assumed to be 0.26, based on an estimated value of the index of refraction m = 1.57 − 0.56i by D'Alessio et al [57]. However, as discussed above, the particular value of the constant is not important for the comparisons, but only for the absolute value obtained of the soot volume fraction.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalzell et al suggested that within the wavelength range from 435.8 to 806.5 nm, the mean value of m is 1.57 − 0.46i for acetylene and 1.57 − 0.50i for propane diffusion flames [60]. In 1973, D'Alessio [57] suggested the value 1.57 − 0.56i as a mean value in visible range [61]. Whilst this value has been widely cited for its simplicity, a number of values of m have been reported by various of investigators as well, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Uncertainty From E(m)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is meant only to give a short survey on some recent results of the investigation of charged particles in flames. For a more extended treatise see [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of experimental results have been obtained in recent years using the optical methods outlined above [55][56][57][58] so that only a few specific topics will be examined here. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 shows that an asymmetry arises in both Qyy (tJ) and QHH (tJ) components and becomes more and more pronounced as the residence time increases [56]. Other evidences of non-Rayleigh behavior come from the wavelength variation of the ratio QHH/Qyy at tJ == 7ff' and tJ == 8ff' and the departure from the A -4 law ofQVV in the range 270-510 run [55]. The first approximation taken for these features is monodisperse Mie scattering which is able to predict those effects in a qualitatively consistent way.…”
Section: Lls Measurements In Premixed Flames -mentioning
confidence: 96%