2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(99)00726-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and structural differences between RF and DC AlxNy magnetron sputtered films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cho has attributed the increase in band gap to consistently improved crystallinity and stoichiometry of the films. However, Dumitru et al [20] and Drüsedau and Koppenhagen [21] have observed different optical properties of AlN films deposited by DC and RF magnetron sputtering under identical operating conditions. A probable explanation for the decrease in band gap as observed in our work could be as follows.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cho has attributed the increase in band gap to consistently improved crystallinity and stoichiometry of the films. However, Dumitru et al [20] and Drüsedau and Koppenhagen [21] have observed different optical properties of AlN films deposited by DC and RF magnetron sputtering under identical operating conditions. A probable explanation for the decrease in band gap as observed in our work could be as follows.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common example for sputtered films is aluminum nitride films. These films were prepared by both DC-and RF-sputtering technique, and their structure and optical properties were compared [26,27].…”
Section: Sputtering Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18,53 For the case of rf sputtering, increasing the N 2 /Ar ratio typically results in an increasing c-axis out-of-plane orientation, as determined by XRD h-2h scans. 12,15,22,47 In contrast, dc sputtering, which yields a smaller ion bombardment energy during deposition, results in the opposite trend 20,21,54 : Increasing the partial pressure of N 2 causes a decrease in the dominance of the XRD AlN 0002 peak, whereas other orientations become observable. Thus, during dc sputtering with a high N 2 partial pressure (or pure N 2 ), the out-of-plane orientation cannot be determined from XRD h-2h scans, as multiple peaks exhibit comparable intensities.…”
Section: A Out-of-plane Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, during dc sputtering with a high N 2 partial pressure (or pure N 2 ), the out-of-plane orientation cannot be determined from XRD h-2h scans, as multiple peaks exhibit comparable intensities. 20,54 Deniz et al, 18 have addressed this problem of hard-to-determine preferred orientation with pole figure measurements and found an abrupt transition from a 0002 AlN texture for N 2 /Ar < 13%, to a texture where the c-axis is tilted by $40 for N 2 /Ar > 13%, for dc reactive sputtered AlN with a deposition angle a ¼ 42 . They attributed this effect to a reduction in the surface diffusion of adsorbed molecules at high N 2 concentration, which causes a c-axis tilt toward the deposition flux.…”
Section: A Out-of-plane Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%