2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26099a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical characterization of an individual polymer-shelled microbubble structure via digital holography

Abstract: Microbubbles are often used as ultrasound contrast agents for sonography. However, polymer-shelled microbubbles have the potential to support also additional functionalities such as, for example, targeted drug delivery. Using digital holographic microscopy we demonstrate that structural information on individual bubbles can be retrieved with high precision combined with low costs and short acquisition time. We have characterized the distributions of size, shell thickness and refractive index for hundreds of po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, it was possible to derive a more rigorous analytical expression that could fit our experimental results. As reported in Section 4.2, the shell thickness values provided using this model fall between 200 nm and 400 nm, in striking similarity with existing literature [12,27,40,41]. Interestingly enough, the comparison with the linearized Hoff model shows that the viscoelastic values are not affected significantly by the thin shell approximation except for t (see Fig.…”
Section: Acoustic Attenuation Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, it was possible to derive a more rigorous analytical expression that could fit our experimental results. As reported in Section 4.2, the shell thickness values provided using this model fall between 200 nm and 400 nm, in striking similarity with existing literature [12,27,40,41]. Interestingly enough, the comparison with the linearized Hoff model shows that the viscoelastic values are not affected significantly by the thin shell approximation except for t (see Fig.…”
Section: Acoustic Attenuation Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average outer diameter and the standard deviation were determined for each ageing day, analysed on a population of ∼200 MBs using the Nikon software EZ-C1 (version 3.9). The effect of ageing on the shell thickness t, which is independent of the MB radius R o as previously reported [27], was also estimated by comparative analysis of the fluorescence intensity spatial profiles acquired on the newer (day 15) and the older (day 75) MB populations (see Fig. S3).…”
Section: Optical Microscopymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…24,25 The MBs used in the present study were designed as a contrast agent based on poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) macromeres. 26 The macromeres are cross-linked by acetalization, thereby forming spheres containing air with a polymer shell thickness ranging between 0.2 m and 0.5 m. 27 Magnetic nanoparticles, i.e., SPION, can be embedded into the polymer shell of the MBs to enable their use as a dual modality imaging agent for both ultrasound and MR imaging. [24][25][26] The incorporation of SPION into MBs reduces the signal intensity on T2 and T2* weighted images due to a faster spin-spin relaxation rate (R2*) of the water molecules surrounding the SPION MBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our particles are dispersed in water, instead of fitting n w , we use the values in [18] for water refractive index as a function of pressure. The fitting procedure requires the calculation of a few hundreds holograms of 124 × 124 pixels, thus we exploited the computational power of a CUDA based graphic processing unit (GTX-470) in order to speed-up the computation [19,20]. The limited numerical aperture of our objective (NA=0.3) prevents the light scattered at an angle larger than arcsin(NA) to be observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%