2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3225150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical determination of Young’s modulus of InAs nanowires

Abstract: We present a study of Young’s modulus of epitaxially grown InAs nanowires with diameters from 40 to 95 nm. The dynamic behavior of the nanowires is investigated using optical stroboscopic imaging. The Young’s modulus, evaluated using the eigenfrequencies of the fundamental and the first excited modes in air, decreases for smaller diameters. To avoid the influence of the electric field on the resonance frequency, we use the free ring-down response to a voltage step rather than driving with a harmonic voltage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental nanowire resonance frequencies (black circles) plotted as a function of the geometry factor G and fitted line through origin (solid line), yielding a constant Young's modulus E = (45 ± 3) GPa. The inset shows an enlarged view of the leftmost part of the plot indicated by a black rectangle, clearly demonstrating that the ten most flexible nanowires are equally well-described by the global value of E as their more rigid counterparts exhibiting a larger geometry factor G. Error bars on the G-axis include the uncertainty in determining r, R and h by SEM analysis.A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental nanowire resonance frequencies (black circles) plotted as a function of the geometry factor G and fitted line through origin (solid line), yielding a constant Young's modulus E = (45 ± 3) GPa. The inset shows an enlarged view of the leftmost part of the plot indicated by a black rectangle, clearly demonstrating that the ten most flexible nanowires are equally well-described by the global value of E as their more rigid counterparts exhibiting a larger geometry factor G. Error bars on the G-axis include the uncertainty in determining r, R and h by SEM analysis.A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this vast spread could be a dependence of Young's modulus on the geometric dimensions of the underlying nanowires, which is actively discussed in part of the research literature [12][13][14][15][33][34][35][36]. In order to elucidate possible size effects in our data, Young's modulus is additionally determined for each individual nanowire, again using eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the resonant excitation of nanowire oscillations that may be induced by an electrical or magnetic ac signal, the amplitude of these self-excited stationary vibrations is not limited by any resonant condition and, as a result, they can be large. In a realistic experimental situation with a CNT resonator of length L ∼ 1 µm, vibration frequency ω ∼ 2π × 200 MHz, and quality factor Q ∼ 10 4 carrying a characteristic current J 0 ∼ 1 nA, the vibration amplitude is A st ∼ 10 nm at T ∼ 0.1 K in a magnetic field of ∼ 10 T. In principle, oscillations with such an amplitude could be directly monitored by clever imaging techniques [18]. We have also demonstrated that the onset and disappearance of these mechanical vibrations are manifest in a pronounced hysteretic behavior of the averaged electrical current through the structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Semiconducting nanostructures also exhibit interesting mechanical properties when their lateral dimension are scaled below 100 nm. 11 Because of the competition between atomic coordination and electronic distribution, surfaces can be softer or harder than the bulk. 12 As a consequence, mechanical properties like Young's modulus can be increased 13 or decreased 14 compared with those of bulk crystals by decreasing the nanowire cross section down to the nanoscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%