2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Flow with Semantic Segmentation and Localized Layers

Abstract: Existing optical flow methods make generic, spatially homogeneous, assumptions about the spatial structure of the flow. In reality, optical flow varies across an image depending on object class. Simply put, different objects move differently. Here we exploit recent advances in static semantic scene segmentation to segment the image into objects of different types. We define different models of image motion in these regions depending on the type of object. For example, we model the motion on roads with homograp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
115
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, 2D optical flow benchmarks have been dominated by label-based methods [7,24], propagation methods [4,18], neural regression networks [10] and models that exploit scene-specific properties like semantics [35,3]. Most of these models do not scale well to the volumetric domain and struggle heavily with memory consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, 2D optical flow benchmarks have been dominated by label-based methods [7,24], propagation methods [4,18], neural regression networks [10] and models that exploit scene-specific properties like semantics [35,3]. Most of these models do not scale well to the volumetric domain and struggle heavily with memory consumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They point out the advantage of obtaining consistent segmentations over entire video sequences, which is also a goal in our approach. Recent techniques jointly solve for RGB video segmentation and optical flow [SLSJB16, TYB16]. Learning‐based approaches have also become popular for motion segmentation [FAFM15] and optical flow [DFI*15], and Sevilla‐Lara et al .…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning‐based approaches have also become popular for motion segmentation [FAFM15] and optical flow [DFI*15], and Sevilla‐Lara et al . [SLSJB16] leverage semantic segmentation using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in their approach. Similar to these techniques, we also obtain both a segmentation and motion estimates.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that this transition causes inaccurate mo- tion vector estimation at both sides of the motion boundary, since the two motion fields influence each other. However, recent work on optical flow estimation has leveraged the use of additional information to improve flow precision, particularly at object boundaries [18,19].…”
Section: Semantic Optical Flow Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%