1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(94)90104-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical lithography: Present status and continuation below 0.25 μm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches from the traditional (photo)lithographic field as well as developments of novel techniques have been reported. The lithographic methods are based on the patterning of a sensitive resist usually by light (Wittekoek 1994); novel techniques include microcontact printing (Mrksich and Whitesides 1995), imprinting (Chouet al 1996), and microfluidic networks (Delamarche et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches from the traditional (photo)lithographic field as well as developments of novel techniques have been reported. The lithographic methods are based on the patterning of a sensitive resist usually by light (Wittekoek 1994); novel techniques include microcontact printing (Mrksich and Whitesides 1995), imprinting (Chouet al 1996), and microfluidic networks (Delamarche et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their first appearance in the early 1980s, chemically amplified (CA) resists have evolved into a leading-edge patterning technology, capable of resolving sub-quarter-micron features. They were made possible by the development of photosensitive onium salts whose irradiation released strong acid; these photoacid generators (PAG) were later combined with acid-sensitive poly( t -BOC−OSt). Recent developments in CA resist chemistry, irradiation techniques, and process conditions have provided a basis for upcoming mass production of 1−4 Gbit DRAM and other devices with successively smaller critical dimensions. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here K 1 and K 2 are scaling factors that are determined by the lithography process. 27 The factor K 1 has been reduced from about 1.0 to below 0.7, mainly by resist and processing improvements. Using incoherent illumination, K 1 is below 0.5.…”
Section: Image Contrast and Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for photolithography two orders are sufficient to define useful patterns, because of the high contrast of the photoresist. 27 The maximum angle transmitted in the microlens array system is limited by vignetting effects within the imaging channels. To obstruct stray light and crosstalk between adjacent channels, all image-forming rays that pass the entrance pupil ͑lens L1͒ of an imaging channel must pass the exit pupil ͑lens L2͒ of the same channel ͑see Fig.…”
Section: Imaging Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%