Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance

Abstract

BackgroundMicrosurgical techniques are considered standard procedures in reconstructive surgery. Although microsurgery by itself is defined as surgery aided by optical magnification, there are no guidelines for determining in which clinical situations a microscope or loupe should be used. Therefore, we conducted standardized experiments to objectively assess the impact of optical magnification in microsurgery.MethodsSixteen participants of microsurgical training courses had to complete 2 sets of experiments. Each set had to be performed with an unaided eye, surgical loupes, and a regular operating microscope. The first set of experiments included coaptation of a chicken femoral nerve, and the second set consisted of anastomosing porcine coronary arteries. Evaluation of the sutured nerves and vessels were performed by 2 experienced microsurgeons using an operating microscope.ResultsThe 16 participants of the study completed all of the experiments. The nerve coaptation and vascular anastomoses exercises showed a direct relationship of error frequency and lower optical magnification, meaning that the highest number of microsurgical errors occurred with the unaided eye. For nerve coaptation, there was a strong relationship (P<0.05) between the number of mistakes and magnification, and this relationship was very strong (P<0.01) for vascular anastomoses.ConclusionsWe were able to prove that microsurgical success is directly related to optical magnification. The human eye's ability to discriminate potentially important anatomical structures is limited, which might be detrimental for clinical results. Although not legally mandatory, surgeries such as reparative surgery after hand trauma should be conducted with magnifying devices for achieving optimal patient outcomes.

Loupes-Only Microsurgery is a Safe Alternative to the Operating Microscope: An Analysis of 1,649 Consecutive Free Flap Breast Reconstructions

“…However, only 75 to 80% of anastomoses performed on 1.5 mm vessels using the microscope were patent; this underscores the experience level of the study groups. 29,30 For anastomoses > 2.5 mm, anastomosis quality, measured by the Gorman scale, 31 was not significantly different for Â2.5 loupes versus the operating microscope. 29 Our study, which tracked revision and failure rates of experienced microsurgeons in 1,649 consecutive free flaps using Â3.5 loupe magnification, seems to refute the laboratory data.…”

Egg-in-Cube: Design and Fabrication of a Novel Artificial Eggshell with Functionalized Surface

“…Tiny blood vessels can be connected and treated by fine manipulation under the magnified field of operation. Since a high level of technical skill is required for surgeons to handle tiny tissues and blood vessels, surgical training by using an animal model is the most effective method to improve surgical performance [ 48 ]. In addition, the evaluation of microsurgical devices and robots with fine accuracy can be conducted using our platform to confirm the handling and suturing performance of tissue and blood vessels [ 49 ].…”

Microsurgery: A Useful and Versatile Tool in Surgical Field

“…Initially magnifying lenses (loupes) were used which were later replaced by surgical microscopes. In loupes, magnification and focal length (working distance) are fixed while both are adjustable in surgical microscopes [10]. These microscopes have foot controls to adjust focus and magnification so that surgeon's hands remain free to manipulate the instruments.…”

“…A magnification of 5x to 40x is required in most of the microsurgical procedures. For dissection 4.7x to 7.8x magnification is commonly used, while for the purpose of anastomosis a magnification range of 7.8x to 12.5x is used [10].…”