Results: Disagreement between BTE and EMM approaches increased with increasing n and p f . For 25 the thinnest screen (t = 50 µm), highest packing fill (p f = 0.5) and largest relative refractive index (n = 5), the BTE model underestimated the absorbed fraction by 40% and the MTF50 by 20%. However, the BTE and EMM predictions agreed well at all simulated packing densities when n ≤ 2. Swank's model agreed with the BTE well when the screen was thick enough to be considered turbid.
Conclusion:Although assumptions of the BTE are violated in powdered-phosphor screens at 30 moderate-to-high packing densities, these lead to negligible effects in the modeling of optical transport for typical phosphor-binder relative refractive indices (n ≤ 2), such as those based on Gd 2 O 2 S:Tb. Swank's diffusion equation solution is an adequate approximation to the BTE if the turbidity condition is satisfied.