1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.38.1865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of crystalline semiconductors and dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
265
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
17
265
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data are represented with open circles; the solid line represents our calculations, the dotted line represents the results of Adachi, 11 and the dashed line represents the calculations of Forouhi and Bloomer. 19 The refractive index rms error obtained for our model is 1.2%, compared with the values of 13.6% for Adachi's MDF and 5.8% for the model of Forouhi and Bloomer. The conventional Adachi model gives the poorest agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental data are represented with open circles; the solid line represents our calculations, the dotted line represents the results of Adachi, 11 and the dashed line represents the calculations of Forouhi and Bloomer. 19 The refractive index rms error obtained for our model is 1.2%, compared with the values of 13.6% for Adachi's MDF and 5.8% for the model of Forouhi and Bloomer. The conventional Adachi model gives the poorest agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Forouhi and Bloomer 19 have proposed a model which is also related to the band structure and requires fewer parameters ͑up to 14͒. However, for the materials investigated here, this model does not bring about significant improvement in accuracy over the conventional Adachi's model, especially around the fundamental band-gap E 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A common approach is the indirect (inverse) synthesis technique { , }⟶{ , }, which is based on inserting multi-constant dispersion function for and (Tan, 2006;Tan et al, 2007;Tan et al, 2006;Theiss, 2012;Forouhi & Bloomer, 1986;Forouhi & Bloomer, 1988;Adachi, 1991;Jellison & Modine, 1996;Chambouleyron & Martínez, 2001;Truong & Tanemura, 2006;Kasap & Capper, 2006;Christman, 1988;Rogalski & Palmer, 2000;Palik, 1998;Dressel & Grüner, 2002;Reitz et al, 1993) into theoretical formulas of transmittance and/or reflectance of a multi-layered structure including the film, and then use a powerful statistical curve-fitting program to attain simulated transmittance and reflectance curves to the entire and data (Solieman et al, 2014;Navarrete et al, 1990;Solieman & Abu-Sehly, 2010;Joo et al, 1999;Dobrowolski et al, 1983;Klein et al, 1990;Kukinyi et al, 1996;Chiao et al, 1995;Theiss, 2012). Numeric inversion approaches, armed with dielectric models, are also used for analyzing optical data acquired from spectroscopic ellipsometry, which are based on measured polarized-light reflection quantities of a structure that are directly related its optical functions.…”
Section: Measurements and Analytical Techniques For Determining Opticmentioning
confidence: 99%