2010
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200983959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of GaSb(001)‐c(2 × 6): The role of surface antisite defects

Abstract: We consider the formation of surface antisite defects on a previously proposed model for the GaSb(001)-c(2 Â 6) surface. Based on ab initio total energy calculations, we show how these defects stabilize the otherwise metallic surface and how their formation is driven by the excess charge associated with the Sbrich surface conditions. The surface-sensitive optical technique of reflectance anisotropy spectroscopy is shown to be crucial for detecting the defects, and computation of spectra yields a good agreement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b)], which is attributed to an Sb-rich regime with Sb-Sb dimer chains on the surface. 26 The As 3d spectrum of the arsenic capped GaSb [ Fig. 2(a)] surface shows peaks at 41.6 and 44.9 eV, which are attributed to elemental arsenic from the cap and arsenic oxides on the surface of the cap, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)], which is attributed to an Sb-rich regime with Sb-Sb dimer chains on the surface. 26 The As 3d spectrum of the arsenic capped GaSb [ Fig. 2(a)] surface shows peaks at 41.6 and 44.9 eV, which are attributed to elemental arsenic from the cap and arsenic oxides on the surface of the cap, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (4 × 3) reconstruction family, 25 the (2 × 4), 26-28 the (2 × 8), 29 the c (2 × 6), 30,31 and the c(2 × 10) 30 reconstructions have all been proposed to explain STM observations on GaSb. It is reasonable to consider these reconstructions for the GaSbBi surface as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the c (2 × 6) and c (2 × 10) reconstructions have not been shown to be stable on GaSb, often attributed to the violation of the electron counting model (ECM). [30][31][32] In those studies, various compositional configurations were tested where Ga was substituted for Sb on second layer Sb sites in an effort to satisfy the ECM. Some of these configurations were energetically more favorable, but not enough to stabilize these reconstructions relative to the (4 × 3) reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%