2008
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/129/1/012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of graphene

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
619
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 965 publications
(639 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
11
619
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the transition from the Boltzmann statistics to the Fermi-Dirac statistics are very much evident with the temperature rise in graphene and Si layers. 34 In overall, this led to the decrease in FF and η of cells with temperature rise.…”
Section: Quantum Efficiency Spectral Response and Temperature Depmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the transition from the Boltzmann statistics to the Fermi-Dirac statistics are very much evident with the temperature rise in graphene and Si layers. 34 In overall, this led to the decrease in FF and η of cells with temperature rise.…”
Section: Quantum Efficiency Spectral Response and Temperature Depmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This response verifies that the reflectance from the monolayer graphene is reduced in the infrared region and increased for shorter wavelengths due to the interband absorption. 34 Also, the better conductivity obtained at n-Gr/p-cSi interface or contacts by optimizing graphene layers in the simulation, helped in further tuning of the cell efficiency. Enhancement in the spectral response was observed with increasing doping concentrations in the layers, possibly due to significant increase in J sc .…”
Section: Quantum Efficiency Spectral Response and Temperature Depmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that it is important to include the substrate influence on electromagnetic radiation especially for atomically-thin materials 40,41 . Here, the current density in a monolayer MoS 2 sample is described by a delta function, j x =σ(ω)δ(z)E x whereσ is the complex conductivity and E x is the x-component of the probe electric field (along the sample's surface).…”
Section: Appendix B: Kramers-kronig Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such framework, the material's 2D conductivity reads [24,93] σ Kubo (ω) = σ intra (ω) + σ inter (ω), …”
Section: Appendix B: Dynamical Conductivity Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%