1993
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90308-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of plasma polymer films (hexamethyldisiloxane)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing power input, which corresponds to an increase in the bias voltage, a linear increase in the refractive index is observed (Figure 9). Similar trends have been found for plasma polymerized methyl methacrylate (26), hexamethyl disiloxane (27), and tetramethyl silane (28). The refractive index of plasma polymerized styrene thin film is 1.78 at -130 V and 2.27 at -195 V at 70 mTorr.…”
Section: Where N C -H Is the Concentration Of C-h Bonds Per Cm 3 Ctsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…With increasing power input, which corresponds to an increase in the bias voltage, a linear increase in the refractive index is observed (Figure 9). Similar trends have been found for plasma polymerized methyl methacrylate (26), hexamethyl disiloxane (27), and tetramethyl silane (28). The refractive index of plasma polymerized styrene thin film is 1.78 at -130 V and 2.27 at -195 V at 70 mTorr.…”
Section: Where N C -H Is the Concentration Of C-h Bonds Per Cm 3 Ctsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Lower carbon contents led to poor barrier efficiencies due to crack formation caused by a low flexibility of the coating, as observed in SEM images (not shown here). Coatings with higher carbon contents led also to poor barrier efficiencies, in this case caused by a lower cross‐linking degree of the films, as seen in the FTIR spectra 49…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma polymer films were deposited at constant plasma conditions with varying deposition time on PDMS and silicon substrates to derive the substrate-specific deposition rate ( Figure S1). The deposition time was adjusted to obtain a 2 nm thin nanolayer on all PDMS species of different stiffness, which was confirmed by ellipsometry analysis (Table 1) based on the different refractive indices of plasma coated HMDSO layers and PDMS substrates 34,35 . The chemical composition of the coated PDMS samples was analysed by XPS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%