2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218625x18501299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Properties of the Rapid Annealed Oxygen-Doped Diamond-Like Carbon Film

Abstract: The amorphous oxygen-doped diamond-like carbon films were prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Compared with the pure diamond-like carbon film, there were much less graphite clusters on the surfaces of the oxygen-doped diamond-like carbon films, and the average transmission of the oxygen-doped diamond-like carbon films in the medium infrared band increased. However, some new absorption peaks in the infrared spectra of the oxygen-doped diamond-like carbon film were generated. Rapid annealing was experimented to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike heating at 350 °C, heating at 400 °C completely modified the morphology of the nanofiber film and the nanofiber structure was no longer present; the nanofiber film was transformed into a buckled film (Figure S9). These reductions of O concentrations by annealing DLC nanofiber film are comparable to the results observed for DLC films. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike heating at 350 °C, heating at 400 °C completely modified the morphology of the nanofiber film and the nanofiber structure was no longer present; the nanofiber film was transformed into a buckled film (Figure S9). These reductions of O concentrations by annealing DLC nanofiber film are comparable to the results observed for DLC films. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These reductions of O concentrations by annealing DLC nanofiber film are comparable to the results observed for DLC films. 45,46 Cu was not detected by either XPS or SEM-EDS (Figures 6b and S3). The typical detection limit of SEM-EDS is 0.1 to 0.3 wt % 47 and of XPS is 0.1 to 1 atom %, 48 indicating that the Cu concentration is very low within the film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%