2022
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8d5d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical–Radio Position Offsets Are Inversely Correlated with AGN Photometric Variability

Abstract: Using photometric variability information from the new Gaia DR3 release, I show for the first time that photometric variability is inversely correlated with the prevalence of optical–radio position offsets in the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) that comprise the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF). While the overall prevalence of statistically significant optical–radio position offsets is 11%, objects with the largest fractional variabilities exhibit an offset prevalence of only ∼2%. These highly vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…collectively called GCRF; Gaia Collaboration et al 2018Collaboration et al , 2022 in the optical. As mentioned previously, there are also notable VLBI-Gaia positional offsets (Mignard et al 2016;Kovalev et al 2017;Charlot et al 2020;Liu et al 2021;Secrest 2022). Observations of radio stars are helpful to tie together these international celestial reference frames (Reid & Honma 2014; Malkin 2016, for more details see Section 3.3.3).…”
Section: Radio Stars: Vlbi Versus Gaia Parallaxesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…collectively called GCRF; Gaia Collaboration et al 2018Collaboration et al , 2022 in the optical. As mentioned previously, there are also notable VLBI-Gaia positional offsets (Mignard et al 2016;Kovalev et al 2017;Charlot et al 2020;Liu et al 2021;Secrest 2022). Observations of radio stars are helpful to tie together these international celestial reference frames (Reid & Honma 2014; Malkin 2016, for more details see Section 3.3.3).…”
Section: Radio Stars: Vlbi Versus Gaia Parallaxesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, these prescriptions turn out to be either overly restrictive or require additional astrophysical information that is currently unavailable. For example, highly variable blazar sources have recently been shown to exhibit optical-radio position offsets far less frequently than their less variable radio-loud counterparts (Secrest 2022), probably due to the smaller line-of-sight angles of their radio jets. Unfortunately, the fraction of blazars in ICRF3 (and generally on the sky) is too small to be exclusively used as a basis of a multifrequency CRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is also based on the assumption that the astrophysical radio-optical offsets are not skycorrelated. Secrest (2022) predicted that non-blazar sources that are not currently exhibiting significant optical-radio offsets, which constitute the majority of ICRF3, are more likely to develop offsets in the future, which further underscores the need for continuous monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, due to differences in the way the BP and RP photometry is handled compared to the G photometry, extended objects will have a flux excess in G BP + G RP when compared to G beyond that expected from differences in passband. This is captured in the Gaia catalog as the BP/RP flux excess factor, and we require that it be less than 2 to ensure that only compact objects are assigned Gaia photometry (e.g., Secrest 2022). The G, G BP , and G RP magnitudes are on the Vega system.…”
Section: Opticalmentioning
confidence: 99%