1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.2592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical spectroscopy of quasimonolayer InAs at the onset of quantum-dot nucleation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently from what we previously observed in monolayer-sized InAs/GaAs single quantum wells [8], in the present case only the heavy-hole free-exciton PR feature could be detected, due to the weakness of the signal. The comparison with recently reported PL results [9,10] concerning the relation between the critical thickness for QD nucleation and the optical response of WLs indicates an effective thickness of 1.6-1.8 ML, in agreement with the critical thickness for the 2D-3D transition of InAs grown on GaAs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differently from what we previously observed in monolayer-sized InAs/GaAs single quantum wells [8], in the present case only the heavy-hole free-exciton PR feature could be detected, due to the weakness of the signal. The comparison with recently reported PL results [9,10] concerning the relation between the critical thickness for QD nucleation and the optical response of WLs indicates an effective thickness of 1.6-1.8 ML, in agreement with the critical thickness for the 2D-3D transition of InAs grown on GaAs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As regards QD2, the second and less intense PR feature, due to its energy position (about 100 meV higher than QD1), it should be attributed either to excited state transitions or to the ground state transition of a second QD family [10,13,16], with a different size and/or morphology with respect to the main family. We lean towards the second attribution consistently with the observation of a different N dependence for the QD1 and QD2 transition energies (see below) and with the morphological characterization by AFM and TEM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, properties that depend crucially on the strong directional bonding characteristic of semiconductors cannot be addressed by our model. Some examples are: the dependence of the shape of GeSi/Si dots on volume 4,5,6 as discussed above; the observation of lens-shaped 29,30 and pyramidal 31 dots and even of coexistence of both types 32 in InAs/GaAs, the other wellstudied system (for a recent review see Ref. 33) or the cases where the accommodation of the lattice misfit of a given material on different crystallographic faces of the same substrate takes place by other mechanisms (also found for InAs/GaAs), 34 where additional aspects as the presence of different surface reconstructions affect the thermodynamical balance of surface energies as well as the diffusion kinetics and, as a consequence, the nucleation behaviour and the growth mode.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best agreement between the experiment and calculation has been obtained for the WL thickness of about 1.6 monolayer and the band offset in the conduction band ͑Q C ͒ of about 87% ͑Q C taken for the unstrained materials, i.e., the so-called chemical band offset which corresponds to about 65% of the band offset in the real strained structure͒, which are reasonable values when compared to those cited in the literature. [17][18][19][26][27][28] In the real case, one would expect some intermixing of the WL QW due to the possible In-Ga atom exchange during growth or some interdiffusion. In general, these processes should modify the confinement potential significantly and also shift the optical transition energies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] They are very similar in many reports and are usually in satisfactory agreea͒ Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: grzegorz.sek@pwr.wroc.pl ment with the calculations assuming a rectangular well shape and its fractional thickness of about 1.5 monolayer. [17][18][19] In this paper we aim at presenting a more detailed discussion of the optical transitions related to the existence of the wetting layer in the InAs/ GaAs QD structures, for which we use as main experimental tools the transmission electron microscopy ͑TEM͒ to deduce the composition profiles and photoreflectance spectroscopy to study the absorptionlike spectra. In particular, we would like to address the following issues: ͑i͒ Why do the WL optical transition energies seem to be constant independent of the structure history?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%