1992
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/256.4.631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical spectroscopy of the massive X-ray binary QV Nor (4U 1538 - 52)*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The companion is a B0I star located at 5.5 kpc (Becker et al, 1977;Reynolds et al, 1992). Variability of the absorption at eclipse egress allows to measure the stellar wind parameters (Clark et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The companion is a B0I star located at 5.5 kpc (Becker et al, 1977;Reynolds et al, 1992). Variability of the absorption at eclipse egress allows to measure the stellar wind parameters (Clark et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter β = 0.8−1.2 is the velocity gradient for an OB supergiant (Friend & Abbott 1986), and R = 17.2 R (Reynolds et al 1992), the radius of the donor. The resulting N H arises from the integration of n H (r) along the line of sight.…”
Section: The Stellar Wind In 4u 1538−52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also depends on the distance between both components and the stellar wind velocity, for the most part. The estimated X-ray luminosity is ∼(2.6−9.1) × 10 36 erg s −1 in the 3−100 keV range, assuming an isotropic emission and a distance of 6.4 kpc Article published by EDP Sciences A140, page 1 of 5 (Reynolds et al 1992). Thus, the analysis of the X-ray spectrum from the neutron star at different orbital phases provides us the variability of the model parameters we can use to compare with accretion models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With M = 1.3 M (Reynolds et al 1992), M 17 = 883 g s −1 (Clark et al 1994;Rodes 2007;Rodes et al 2008), and μ 30 = 1.8 G cm 3 (Rodes 2007), the Eq. (3) yields the value R m ∼ 6.2 × 10 7 cm.…”
Section: X-ray Continuummentioning
confidence: 99%