2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2018.8437750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Achievable Rates for Computation With Random Homologous Codes

Abstract: The problem of computing a linear combination of sources over a multiple access channel is studied.Inner and outer bounds on the optimal tradeoff between the communication rates are established when encoding is restricted to random ensembles of homologous codes, namely, structured nested coset codes from the same generator matrix and individual shaping functions, but when decoding is optimized with respect to the realization of the encoders. For the special case in which the desired linear combination is "matc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important aspect of our framework is the resulting simultaneous joint decoding rate region for computeforward. The joint typicality decoder presented in this paper was shown to be optimal with respect to nested linear codes in [48] for the K = 2, L = 1 case. On the other hand, the sharpest-known analysis for a lattice-based compute-forward strategy relies on suboptimal sequential decoding [38] due to the technical limitations in analyzing joint decoders for lattice codes [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important aspect of our framework is the resulting simultaneous joint decoding rate region for computeforward. The joint typicality decoder presented in this paper was shown to be optimal with respect to nested linear codes in [48] for the K = 2, L = 1 case. On the other hand, the sharpest-known analysis for a lattice-based compute-forward strategy relies on suboptimal sequential decoding [38] due to the technical limitations in analyzing joint decoders for lattice codes [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The last two rate inequalities (47)- (48) are combined via a logical 'or' (due to the union over S). Recombining the above three case distinctions on the coefficient pair (c 1 , c 2 ) via a logical 'and' (due to union over C) yields the rate region R LMAC as defined in (10).…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, span(A) ⊆ span(B), we have a bound on P (E 3 ∩ E c 1 |M) that tends to zero as n → ∞ if for all full rank C ∈ F L C ×L B q , 0 ≤ L C < L B , there exists an S that satisfies (13) and…”
Section: P(e 3 ∩ E Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4: The achievable rate region in Proposition 4 is the largest region thus far established in the literature. As a matter of fact, there is some indication that this region is optimal in the sense that it cannot be improved by using maximum likelihood decoding [9], [10]. Still, it is in general strictly smaller than the capacity region of the k-sender DM-MAC.…”
Section: A Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%