2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014rs005646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal antenna topologies for spatial gradient detection in differential GNSS

Abstract: This paper describes new methods to determine optimal reference antenna topologies for detection of spatial gradients in differential Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Such gradients can be caused by ionospheric fronts and orbit ephemeris faults, and if undetected, represent major threats to aircraft navigation integrity. Differential carrier phase measurements between ground antennas are highly sensitive to spatial gradients. Therefore, monitors using spatially separated ground antennas have recentl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows an example of a rectangular box orientation of reference receiver antennas for a GAST-D facility with antenna separation distances identified as a and b (where a and b might be the same or different) (Reuter et al 2012). Several analyses of possible receiver orientations and separation distances have been conducted (e.g., see Jing et al 2015), mostly suggesting separations from 150 m to 1 km. On the airborne side, two additional monitors targeted at ionospheric threats are included when using GAST-D: the dualsolution ionospheric gradient monitoring architecture (DSIGMA) and an airborne CCD monitor similar to the one implemented on the ground (Pullen et al 2017).…”
Section: Ground-based Augmentation System Approach Service Type D (Gast-d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows an example of a rectangular box orientation of reference receiver antennas for a GAST-D facility with antenna separation distances identified as a and b (where a and b might be the same or different) (Reuter et al 2012). Several analyses of possible receiver orientations and separation distances have been conducted (e.g., see Jing et al 2015), mostly suggesting separations from 150 m to 1 km. On the airborne side, two additional monitors targeted at ionospheric threats are included when using GAST-D: the dualsolution ionospheric gradient monitoring architecture (DSIGMA) and an airborne CCD monitor similar to the one implemented on the ground (Pullen et al 2017).…”
Section: Ground-based Augmentation System Approach Service Type D (Gast-d)mentioning
confidence: 99%