2019
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920190676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal condition of cannabis maceration to obtain the high cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol content

Abstract: the aim of this work was to optimize a maceration condition of cannabis (Cannabis sativa l.). A circumscribed central composite experimental design was applied in this work. temperature and time were varied from 40-80 °C and 30-90 min, respectively. the three responses (i.e., extraction yield, cannabidiol content, and Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol content) were predicted by computer software. the yield was high when cannabis was macerated using ethanol at high temperature and long duration time. While cannabidiol a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many conventional and non-conventional solvent-based procedures have been already performed in the literature targeting cannabinoids from hemp. In this work the general, fast and common alcoholic solvent maceration method was selected in order to set a benchmark and compare results from supercritical methodologies (Fiorini et al, 2019;Monton et al, 2019;Mudge et al, 2017). By conventional methanolic extraction, the collected product was a green oil (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Conventional Solvent Extraction Versus Supercritical Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many conventional and non-conventional solvent-based procedures have been already performed in the literature targeting cannabinoids from hemp. In this work the general, fast and common alcoholic solvent maceration method was selected in order to set a benchmark and compare results from supercritical methodologies (Fiorini et al, 2019;Monton et al, 2019;Mudge et al, 2017). By conventional methanolic extraction, the collected product was a green oil (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Conventional Solvent Extraction Versus Supercritical Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous works demonstrated the extraction of plant active compounds from cannabis [36], Centella asiatica [37], and Vernonia cinerea [38]. All works applied circumscribed central composite experimental design, which has been widely used in response to surface modeling and optimization [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to C. asiatica and cannabis, the active compounds were soluble in ethanol, so ethanol was selected as a safe extraction solvent. Due to the lower flash point and boiling point of ethanol compared with water, the lower extraction temperature was used: 40-60 °C for C. asiatica [37] and 40-80 °C for cannabis [36], and the longer extraction time could be applied: 60-120 min for C. asiatica [37] and 30-90 min for cannabis [36]. Our present work also used ethanol to extract trans-anethole, a volatile substance, so the low temperature range, 40-80 °C, and the short duration time, 10-30 min were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ 9 -THC) are hemp's most well-known active compounds. Δ 9 -THC is a primary psychoactive compound, while CBD is a non-psychoactive compound (Monton et al 2019, Poniatowska et al 2019. So far, the basic aspect of the legal regulations for the cultivation of hemp is the content of Δ 9 -THC, which by law cannot exceed 0.2% of dry weight (EU Regulation 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%