2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2014.2304152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control of Scalar Conservation Laws Using Linear/Quadratic Programming: Application to Transportation Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose (q 1 (j), q 2 (j)) , ∀j ∈ J is the optimal solution to CP (29), then there exists a set of multipliers {λ i } that satisfies KKT. We now show that, the set of multipliers {λ i } also satisfies ∪ jmax j=1 KKT j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose (q 1 (j), q 2 (j)) , ∀j ∈ J is the optimal solution to CP (29), then there exists a set of multipliers {λ i } that satisfies KKT. We now show that, the set of multipliers {λ i } also satisfies ∪ jmax j=1 KKT j .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there are other related approaches that also do not require discretiza-tion of the time-space domain, including our earlier result on optimal traffic control on networks [29] and a recent continuous-time solver of traffic dynamics on the network [18]. Our earlier work [29] investigates control of the HJ PDE on a network and assumes all junctions are fully signalized by traffic actuators. Therefore, it does not require a model of the traffic dynamics at the junction and consequently it cannot be used to solve the HJ PDE on a network when the junction dynamics are prescribed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third group of traffic strategies adopting simplifications in the traffic model we can mention the following: the Traffic responsive Urban Control (TUC) strategy (Aboudolas et al 2010), which solves a linearquadratic problem based on a store-and-forward simplification of the traffic flow; the DISCO or mixedinteger linear program approaches where traffic is modeled after the cell-transmission model (Lo, Chang, and Chan 2001;Lo 2001); model predictive control strategies based on the simplified S-model (Lin et al 2012); and gating feedback regulators derived via a simplified dynamic model based on the network fundamental diagram of traffic flow (Keyvan-Ekbatani et al 2012). We conclude this nonexhaustive overview by mentioning recently emerging approaches for optimal control of the transportation network (Han, Szeto, and Friesz 2015;Li, Canepa, and Claudel 2014): these methods rely on a Lighthill-Whitham-Richards traffic flow model and characterize the optimal solution by the Lax-Hopf formula. The advantage is that no specific approximations nor discretization are required; however, one limitation is currently the lack of computational tractability, when the problem size scales up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas dynamic-based two species traffic models with the two species being cars and trucks have also been defined [16], [17]. There have also been papers on analysis of stability in traffic flows [22], [23], and control methods for PDE traffic models [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%