2015
DOI: 10.1080/10236198.2015.1045890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control of the freezing time in the Hegselmann–Krause dynamics

Abstract: We study the optimal control problem of minimizing the freezing time in the discrete Hegselmann -Krause (HK) model of opinion dynamics. The underlying model is extended with a set of strategic agents that can freely place their opinion at every time step. Indeed, if suitably coordinated, the strategic agents can significantly lower the freezing time of an instance of the HK model. We give several lower and upper worstcase bounds for the freezing time of a HK system with a given number of strategic agents, whil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many publications have used the model for investigating descriptive questions, most notably, questions concerning the conditions that lead a community of initially disagreeing agents to reach a consensus and those that lead to polarization (e.g., Lorenz, 2003Lorenz, , 2008. A major focus of studies lay, and (due to many open questions) still lies, on the time that it takes to reach a stable final pattern (Chazelle, 2011;Kurz & Rambau, 2011;Kurz, 2015;Hegarty & Wedin, 2016). Other work has recruited the model to shed light on a number of normative issues of interest mostly to philosophers, for instance, concerning the practice of assertion (Olsson, 2008), the resolution of disagreement amongst peers (Douven, 2010), and efficient truth approximation (Douven & Kelp, 2011).…”
Section: Bounded Confidence Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many publications have used the model for investigating descriptive questions, most notably, questions concerning the conditions that lead a community of initially disagreeing agents to reach a consensus and those that lead to polarization (e.g., Lorenz, 2003Lorenz, , 2008. A major focus of studies lay, and (due to many open questions) still lies, on the time that it takes to reach a stable final pattern (Chazelle, 2011;Kurz & Rambau, 2011;Kurz, 2015;Hegarty & Wedin, 2016). Other work has recruited the model to shed light on a number of normative issues of interest mostly to philosophers, for instance, concerning the practice of assertion (Olsson, 2008), the resolution of disagreement amongst peers (Douven, 2010), and efficient truth approximation (Douven & Kelp, 2011).…”
Section: Bounded Confidence Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%