1989
DOI: 10.1109/59.32577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal demand-side response to electricity spot prices for storage-type customers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convex hull reformulation can be written with constraints (2) - (7). Note that M 2,p,g,m is the maximum production of product g in mode m.…”
Section: Production Modes and Feasible Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The convex hull reformulation can be written with constraints (2) - (7). Note that M 2,p,g,m is the maximum production of product g in mode m.…”
Section: Production Modes and Feasible Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial approach by Daryanian et al (1989) shows the economic benefit of demand response for air separation plants, but does not consider discrete operating decisions such as equipment shutdowns and startups. Ierapetritou et al (2002) as well as Karwan and Keblis (2007) extend the methodology to incorporate discrete operating decisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daryanian et al [7] first identified the opportunity to exploit energy storage in real-time electricity markets using a linear programming formulation similar to ours. However, their problem formulation ignores many of the battery inefficiencies that influence the realizable savings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the inverse problem of scarce capacity for import (resulting, for example, from electrification of heating and transport or increasing adoption of air-conditioning for cooling) network issues resulting from PV penetration can be assuaged through development of demand response and energy storage resources [5], [6], which can introduce flexibility to deal with network constraints through either storage (shifting grid consumption in time), substitution (switching provision of an energy service to an alternative device/energy vector) or energy service curtailment (reducing consumption of a final energy service) [7]. In this regard, development of a multienergy view may be particularly useful [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%