2020
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x20910271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal design and experimental evaluation of magneto-rheological mount applied to start/stop mode of vehicle powertrain

Abstract: Magneto-rheological mount is one of the most effective vibration isolation devices for the vibration isolation system of vehicle powertrain. In this article, a flow type of magneto-rheological mount was proposed to control the vibration and the torque excitation of the engine when vehicle was in start/stop mode. A mathematical model for the flow type of magneto-rheological mount was formulated with consideration of the influence of current on magneto-rheological fluid viscosity and the relationship between liq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where C 1 and C 2 are the modified coefficient, when Nguyen et al, 2013). L 1 = L 2 , t y is the shear yield stress, which affects the damping force through the magnetic flux density (Deng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mechanical Model Of Mr Dampermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where C 1 and C 2 are the modified coefficient, when Nguyen et al, 2013). L 1 = L 2 , t y is the shear yield stress, which affects the damping force through the magnetic flux density (Deng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mechanical Model Of Mr Dampermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where R 1 is the inner diameter of the inner magnetic core, L is the height of the magnetic core, H 0 is the gap width of the damping channel, q is flow rate in damping channel and h is the fluid viscosity without an applied magnetic field. The yield pressure drop is expressed as (Deng et al, 2020): Where L 1 is the effective magnetic pole length and L 1 = L 2 , and t y is the shear yield stress. The total pressure drop of the radial flow channel is:…”
Section: Pressure Drop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A p is the equivalent cross-sectional area of the upper chamber, C 1 and C 2 are the volume flexibility of the upper and lower chambers, P 1 and P 2 are the pressure of the upper and lower chambers, and Q r denotes the flow rate of the fluid through the rate-dip channel. Assuming that the flow of fluid through the rate-dip channel is laminar and that the inlet losses can be neglected, the fluid inertia and fluid resistance flowing through the rate-dip channel are I r and R r , respectively, and the solution expression is as follows (Doebelin, 1998).…”
Section: Rate-dip Channel Optimized Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, mounts used for engine vibration isolation can be divided into rubber mounts, hydraulic mounts, semi-active mounts, and active mounts. Compared to rubber mounts, hydraulic mounts (Fan, 2006) improve noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) performance at low frequency, but the greater dynamic stiffness at high frequency due to hardening is not conducive to noise reduction. Active mounts can achieve better NVH performance in a wider band under automotive driving conditions, but their complex structure and high cost are only used in a few luxury vehicles (Hausberg et al, 2015;Römling et al, 2003;Fan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%