2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/8252086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Design of Water Supply Network Based on Adaptive Penalty Function and Improved Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: In view of the shortcomings of water supply network optimization design based on the traditional genetic algorithm in water supply safety and economy, an improved crossover operator adaptive algorithm and penalty function are proposed to improve the traditional genetic algorithm, which can effectively solve the problem of local optimal solution caused by too early convergence of the traditional genetic algorithm in pipe network optimization design. Taking a typical annular water supply network as an example, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with traditional optimization algorithms, GA usually performs better when solving complex combinatorial optimization problems. In recent decades, GA has been widely applied to various optimization problems [42][43][44]. However, the traditional GA requires many iterations for the best solution, which results in a long optimization time.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithm 221 Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional optimization algorithms, GA usually performs better when solving complex combinatorial optimization problems. In recent decades, GA has been widely applied to various optimization problems [42][43][44]. However, the traditional GA requires many iterations for the best solution, which results in a long optimization time.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithm 221 Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GAs are biologically motivated adaptive computer techniques based on natural selection and genetic operators as Wang (1991), Naghibi et al (2017), Ding et al (2022), Shirajuddin et al (2023), and Guan et al (2023). These algorithms are often suggested to solve complex optimization problems by Zanfei et al (2020), Meirelles et al (2017), Di Nardo et al (2014), Do et al (2016), and Mambretti and Orsi (2016).…”
Section: Overall Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have used genetic algorithms to optimize duct diameter combinations [19][20][21]. There are various improved genetic algorithms such as using adaptive penalty functions [22], improved crossover operator [23] and mutation operators [24,25], as well as in combination with hydraulic simulation software such as EPANET 2.2 [26]. However, the optimization objects of previous studies are typically urban water supply networks, while this study focuses on DOV networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%