2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2016.7728499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal electric load prediction from the KLM model for ultrasound energy receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we will see later, the acoustic boundary conditions are critical for an accurate optimal load prediction. Furthermore, it seems that the authors did not model the cables between the receiver and the LED bulb load, which influence the anti-resonance's frequency and impedance and therefore the optimal electric load value [17].…”
Section: Motivation For Developing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we will see later, the acoustic boundary conditions are critical for an accurate optimal load prediction. Furthermore, it seems that the authors did not model the cables between the receiver and the LED bulb load, which influence the anti-resonance's frequency and impedance and therefore the optimal electric load value [17].…”
Section: Motivation For Developing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KLM model has also been used to optimize the energy transmission between emitter and receiver. The model was used in [17,19] to simulate the receiver alone and, both the emitting and the receiving transducers, together with the media in between, were modeled in [22]. However, there is no clear insight into how the parameters act on the energy transmission because the KLM model is built by concatenating matrices.…”
Section: Motivation For Developing the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we considered a second approach as explained in [13,24], which defined the electric load that maximized the power dissipation at the attached electric load in the receiver. F in Equation (1) at the front face of the receiver was a combination of forward and backward traveling waves due to acoustic impedance mismatch.…”
Section: Klm Model For Acoustic Power Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, the transducers were mechanically pressed to the metal wall using Neoprene rubber with low specific acoustic impedance on the backside to minimize the emission losses. For the approach illustrated in Figure 1, the energy transmission depends heavily on the properties of the piezoceramic material [10], the acoustic impedance of the media [11], and the media attenuation [12], as well as the transmission frequency [13] and the attached electric loads [14]. In [14], the zero reflection and power maximization condition for a similar power link were compared to each other with water as the transmission medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%