In this paper, we present an analytic model for thickness resonating plate ultrasound energy receivers, which we have derived from the piezoelectric and the wave equations and, in which we have included dielectric, viscosity and acoustic attenuation losses. Afterwards, we explore the optimal electric load predictions by the zero reflection and power maximization approaches present in the literature with different acoustic boundary conditions, and discuss their limitations. To validate our model, we compared our expressions with the KLM model solved numerically with very good agreement. Finally, we discuss the differences between the zero reflection and power maximization optimal electric loads, which start to differ as losses in the receiver increase.

No abstract

No abstract

In this paper, we aim to optimize piezoelectric plate receivers for acoustic power transfer applications by analyzing the influence of the losses and of the acoustic boundary conditions. We derive the analytic expressions of the efficiency of the receiver with the optimal electric loads attached, and analyze the maximum efficiency value and its frequency with different loss and acoustic boundary conditions. To validate the analytical expressions that we have derived, we perform experiments in water with composite transducers of different filling fractions, and see that a lower acoustic impedance mismatch can compensate the influence of large dielectric and acoustic losses to achieve a good performance. Finally, we briefly compare the advantages and drawbacks of composite transducers and pure PZT (lead zirconate titanate) plates as acoustic power receivers, and conclude that 1–3 composites can achieve similar efficiency values in low power applications due to their adjustable acoustic impedance.

In this paper, we verify the two optimal electric load concepts based on the zero reflection condition and on the power maximization approach for ultrasound energy receivers. We test a high loss 1–3 composite transducer, and find that the measurements agree very well with the predictions of the analytic model for plate transducers that we have developed previously. Additionally, we also confirm that the power maximization and zero reflection loads are very different when the losses in the receiver are high. Finally, we compare the optimal load predictions by the KLM and the analytic models with frequency dependent attenuation to evaluate the influence of the viscosity.