2002
DOI: 10.2202/1538-0645.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Environmental Regulation in the Presence of Other Taxes: The Role of Non-separable Preferences and Technology

Abstract: Recent studies find that environmental taxes typically exacerbate pre-existing tax distortions and, therefore, the optimal pollution tax should lie below the Pigouvian level (social marginal damages). This paper analyzes a general equilibrium model with non-separable preferences and technology, relatively rare assumptions in this literature, and finds that the second-best optimal pollution tax can be above or below the first-best Pigouvian level. Surprisingly, the ordering of the two does not depend on the deg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 These assumptions are typical in the literature about second-best taxes on pollution, following Bovenberg and de Mooij (1994), Schöb (1997), and many others. Exceptions include Parry (1995), Ballard, Goddeeris and Kim (2000), , , West and Williams (2002), and Kim (2002). These exceptions look at taxes on a polluting good.…”
Section: Interpretations and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 These assumptions are typical in the literature about second-best taxes on pollution, following Bovenberg and de Mooij (1994), Schöb (1997), and many others. Exceptions include Parry (1995), Ballard, Goddeeris and Kim (2000), , , West and Williams (2002), and Kim (2002). These exceptions look at taxes on a polluting good.…”
Section: Interpretations and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent papers that use a similar model, but assume homotheticity and separability in deriving optimal taxes includeGoulder et al (1999),Parry et al (1999), andWilliams (2001) Parry and Small (2002). andBallard et al (2000) relax the assumption of homotheticity, but maintain separability Kim (2002). provides a theoretical model that derives an expression for the optimal pollution tax without imposing separability or homotheticity, but does not include any empirical estimates using that expression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Under this assumption, there is a marginal welfare cost due to labor income taxation, that is, ρ 2 > 0.…”
Section: Interaction Of Labor and Environmental Taxation Under Wage Umentioning
confidence: 99%